- #WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS INSTALL#
- #WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS ARCHIVE#
- #WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS RAR#
- #WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS WINDOWS 10#
- #WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS PC#
Entropy does this without a problem Unarchiver (I think that's what it's called) did too (when I last used it).
I found some ancient (by web standards!) files that ended with a sequential number string (xxxxx.0001, xxxxx.0002 etc) and wanted to know what they were. Winzip volunteered to open them (it has a habit of doing this without asking) but couldn't.
#WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS ARCHIVE#
Entropy, again, opened them no problems (turns out it was an archive of old TV shows BTW). Entropy was last updated in 2013 and still blows Winzip out of the water. Now, the thing that really irritates me about WinZip is the number of steps required to open an archive in the first place! I can't choose a default place or way to open an archive, so when I want to open an archive I have to click the "unzip" icon, then choose from a list of services that I want to open the archive on my mac, then choose the location on my mac where I want to open the archive, then open the archive. I was going to rate this two stars, but because the developers want $30 for something of this quality, I think one star is fair. If you have any questions, feel free to comment.It has been a long time that i have been using WinZip on my Windows system, i think that has been even before 2000 that i switched to WinAce and later Winrar. If you need the smallest size possible, go with 7-Zip. ZIP format can be opened on Windows, Mac, Linux and even ChromeOS without any additional software, the built-in Windows compression is the best choice for compatibility. So whether you are using Windows 7, 8 or 10, you will get the same compression ratio.Īgain, since.
#WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS WINDOWS 10#
Plus, WinZip will set you back at least $30, so the free option makes much more sense.Īlso, the compression algorithm in Windows 7 seems to be exactly the same as in Windows 10 since the files ended up being exactly the same size. WinZip is another option, but the difference between built-in Windows compression and WinZIP is minimal. If compatibility is an issue, then I recommend using the built-in compression in Windows.
#WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS RAR#
rar files will require additional software on Windows, Mac and Linux. If you are compressing data for yourself, then it doesn’t really matter which format you use.
#WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS INSTALL#
In order for someone to open a 7-ZIP or WinRAR file, they will need to download and install the appropriate software on their machines first. The only issue with programs like 7-ZIP and WinRAR, both of which did the best in compression, is that they use proprietary formats that are not fully supported on other systems. So should you go out and get 7-ZIP to zip your files? It depends. 7-Zip has been around for a while and they have ranked at the very top for best compression utility on multiple third-party tests, so the numbers are not really surprising. Well, in terms of just compression ability, 7-Zip is the clear winner.
In addition to the built-in Windows 7 compression, I’m also going to run the same set of data on Windows 10 to see if there is any difference between the versions of Windows.
#WINZIP FOR MAC REVIEWS PC#
I’m using a Windows 7 PC with Service Pack 1 and I installed the latest versions of each program as of the date of this post: 7-Zip 15.09 beta (64-bit), WinZip version 20 and WinRAR 圆4 5.30 beta 6. In my case, I took 1.47 GBs of videos (different formats), images (RAW and other formats), documents (PDF, Office files, etc) and music files (MP3, M4A, etc) and passed them through each compression utility with default settings.įirst, let’s start with the setup I have and the versions. I don’t like just compressing images or just compressing documents because the differences end up being very small and it’s hard to choose a clear winner. For my tests, I decided to create a test folder with a bunch of data in various formats. Real World Compression Testįirst, let’s just look at straight compression numbers because that’s always fun. Beyond these four, there are many other options, but I found these to be the most popular and well known by most people. In this article, I’ll go through four different compression tools and try to give you the advantages and disadvantages for each.
0 kommentar(er)
